The question of how to perform a work of art is in its infancy.
Performance artists and other artists performing their art are not like ordinary artists. Unlike most artists who study the arts, performing artists get paid by performing their art. They also get paid per performance, which is why some artists are paid based on how many times they perform.
Although artists who perform are paid per performance, artists performing their art are paid per work of art. This is like the “hired gun” argument. The argument goes that if someone hires a paid actor to act like a clown in a movie and is paid for her performance, as with a performance artist, then the actor is the “hired gun.” No, the acting is the performance.
The performance artist argument goes too far. If you’re an artist with a large body of work to keep track of, you’re going to be paid for your work, not your performance.
Artists perform a whole variety of work from painting to dance, music, even writing. But the thing is that artists are paid per performance, not per performance artist. If youre an artist whose skill and artistry youre working on, you have the option of setting a price for your work. The more work you can do for a given fee, the more money you can earn.
Artists (and most programmers) are paid by the hour, not the piece of work. The more you work, the more money you make. To put it another way, if you write a check to pay your rent, you’re not actually making money. You’re making money by the hour.
Artists and software developers both earn money by performing for other people. Artists get paid a percentage of the revenue they generate, programmers get a percentage of the time they spend doing the work and making the work. In the case of programmers, this kind of compensation is called a “labor share.” Some people argue that the labor share is a “loophole” that allows programmers to make money without actually doing any work. That’s simply not true.
The labor share is really just a way of saying that it is possible for software developers to make more money than they otherwise would have if they were not doing the work. The software developers who receive a labor share are also the ones who actually work on the software. If you are doing the work and have no say or input in how it is done, then you cannot be compensated for this labor.
It is possible for software developers to reap the benefits of this loophole. For example, I am a software developer at a software development company and have no say or input into how a company will design a website or how a company will market its software. Therefore, I cannot be compensated for this labor share. If I am doing the work and have no say at all in how it is done, then I am not getting any of the benefits of this labor share.
The fellowship of performing arts is a loophole in the copyright law. In order for software developers to be paid for their work, they must take a percentage of the profits. This is a loophole that allows software developers to reap the benefits of the profits they make from the software they create. This is the most common way to get a software developer paid as an employee.
