I’ve got a photo of the last time I took a picture of the Renaissance. That was in the 1980s. Then I got to take a picture of the Renaissance in Europe for the first time in about 2000. That’s how modern my blog is.
I guess I just wanted to take a picture of the Renaissance because there’s really nothing else to do with my day right now.
For me, the Renaissance is about the works of those artists who were so innovative and creative they invented works of art that no one else had yet seen or created. The Renaissance was a great time and a great period in the history of art, and its artists were all at the top of their game. We all know that the artists in the Renaissance were painters, and the artists who were really, really good were the ones who were in the middle of their creative process.
Artists who were in the middle of their creative process were those who had a lot of skill but no talent. In other words, they knew how to paint but didn’t have any real talent. There was an art called “the middle of the middle” which was a way of looking at this group of artists and saying, “Okay, they’re great, but they’re not really all that great.
The first piece of advice I’d give to artists who want to make a living from their art is to not be in the middle of their creative process. We’re talking about artists who had no real talent or skill, so the advice would be to focus on the things they were good at. These artists were able to paint the world they saw, but they were not able to paint the world they thought they could paint.
You could argue that the first artists created a visual aesthetic, but the second artists created an aesthetic that was visual but also had a deeper meaning. This is where we can find the definition of art.
Artists who create art have a specific definition of what art is, and this is important. What makes a good painting? What makes a good painting that has meaning? What makes a good painting that is beautiful? What makes a good painting that is meaningful? These are hard questions to answer, and I have to say, it’s quite interesting that the art world has had no definite answer to these questions for nearly two thousand years.
A painting is an interpretation, a representation of the world that the artist creates. So in order for art to be truly meaningful, it has to not only be beautiful, but it has to be meaningful. To be meaningful means that an artist has to have deep meaning and purpose, and I feel that this is a hard question to answer and I haven’t really learned much from the answers I’ve read, but the answer does seem to be that art is created with meaning in mind.
To get a better sense of how art functions, one of the first questions an art historian will ask is what type of meaning is involved with the artist’s work. For most of history the answer was that the artist was trying to show that the world was still meaningful and that the world was still beautiful. This is because the artist, or the artist’s work, was not created purely for the artist’s own amusement.
But in the late 17th century they began to question this method of thinking. For example, painters of the time such as Jean-Baptiste Greuze knew that showing that the world was still beautiful, but also that it was still a beautiful world, was still relevant. So Greuze decided to use a slightly different method of creating art, one that would show the world was still beautiful while also showing that the world was still meaningful.
